cupure logo
trumpletterstrumpsletterloswarshowprotestsangelesdemocrats

A nuanced approach to ageing, sex and gender | Letters

Readers respond to an article by Susanna Rustin about a generational divide in perspectivesBorn in 1976, I am around the same age as Susanna Rustin and the generation of “middle-aged, gender-critical women” who believe that their biological sex should underpin and define their rights (Why is there such a generational divide in views on sex and gender in Britain?, 5 June). I am not one of those people. Forty-nine years’ experience of living in a female body in a world deformed by class, caste and economic and racial inequality – never mind environmental destruction – has only made me wonder quite why it matters so much to some people.A truly progressive society should be moving towards seeing the person first, both beyond and in profound recognition of their politicised identities. One can see biological sex as both fundamental and immaterial at the same time. As I approach 50, it’s clear to me that it’s possible to hold both these thoughts simultaneously. My menopausal womanhood matters as it gets in the way of things I want to do in life. But there’s no way it matters to me above all else, and there’s no chance it gets in the way to a greater degree than the various effects of social and economic inequality. Continue reading...

Comments

Opinions