cupure logo
labourtrumpstarmerlettersstopbilltrumpsisraelbritainstax

Casey review: wider concerns on child welfare must be addressed | Letters

Too many care homes follow procedure but don’t take a personal interest in children’s wellbeing, says John Burton, while Brigid Featherstone says invaluable data around child protection isn’t being collected. Plus a letter from Simon TweedLouise Casey’s report (Grooming gangs in UK thrived in ‘culture of ignorance’, Casey report says, 16 June) makes good sense. Nevertheless, her recommendations, and those who must act on them, won’t prevent the exploitation and abuse of children in care. In her appearance at the home affairs select committee last week, she highlighted how the system had failed the children “missing” from care. As so often happens, the system ends up protecting the organisation rather than the child.If children’s home workers follow procedure and conduct a return-home interview with the child, they are deemed to have done their job. But in some good children’s homes, where workers are supported to be personally and collectively concerned for every child, they will worry; they will stay up all night; sometimes they go out searching for the child, putting themselves at considerable risk. They will do what a good parent would do. Filling forms and following procedures does not protect children. Continue reading...

Comments

Opinions