cupure logo
trumptrumpsrevealswomanpolicedeathattackmajorharvardcrash

Tory Shadow Minister Torn Apart On BBC Question Time Over His Attack On EU Deal

Kieran Mullan on BBC Question TimeA Conservative MP was repeatedly torn apart on BBC Question Time last night over his take on the UK’s new EU deal.Shadow justice minister Kieran Mullan claimed Keir Starmer’s agreement has granted the EU superior authority over disputes.He was referring to the terms around trading animal and plant produce.The deal states there would be a “dispute resolution mechanism with an independent arbitration panel that ensures the Court of Justice of the European Union is the ultimate authority for all questions of European Union law.”Mullan said: “They [Labour] have said the EU courts will decide.”But Paymaster General and the minister for EU relations, Nick Thomas-Symonds, quickly jumped in: “No they haven’t.”Mullan hit back: “Yes they have! It’s an independent arbitrator, but the ECJ  [European Court of Justice] will be the ultimate decision-maker.”“No, you’re mistaken, I’ve got to correct that,” Thomas-Symonds replied.The two men started to shout over each other so presenter Fiona Bruce raised her voice, and put her arms between the politicians.“Hang on! Oh my god!” She said, before letting the minister explain.Thomas-Symonds said: “Kieran is mixing up having to refer a very specific interpretation of European law to the Court of Justice which then refers it back to the panel which makes –”Mullan cut in: “Not true.”The minister just looked at the Tory and said: “I negotiated the deal, Kieran.”That sparked laughter in the room, but Mullan continued trying to talk over him.Conservative MP Kieran Mullan makes false statementsTwo panelists correct himKieran Mullan doubles down #BBCQTPeople of Bexhill and Battle, this is your MP embarrassing himself on national TV pic.twitter.com/MiECCuMUB0— Farrukh (@implausibleblog) May 22, 2025Mullan also argued against the deal as a whole, telling Question Time: “It’s easy to conclude a negotiation if you give the other side what they want. That isn’t a success for this country, and particularly for example for our fishermen.”He continued: “Labour have handed them a 12-year agreement that is not in the interests of British fishermen and the industry has been very clear about saying that.”But this claim was met with backlash too, this time by presenter Fiona Bruce.She pointed out that Labour has just extended the deal the Tories already set up with their Brexit agreement.Bruce noted that at the time, the former Conservative government called it, “the best possible deal”.Mullan said that was the best possible outcome at the time, adding: “The fishing industry were clear we had to maintain a year-by-year negotiating position.”“A trade deal is not supermarket sweep,” he continued. “You don’t get prizes by rushing around you can get, and saying it’s a success, that isn’t how negotiations work. You have to be tough sometimes, you have to be willing to say no.”He then claimed Labour have “surrendered on so many issues”, and that they were bringing freedom of movement “in through the back door”.But The Economist’s editor-in-chief Zanny Minton Beddoes took aim at this  language.“It’s not a surrender document, that’s complete nonsense,” she said. “It’s a sensible, modest step forward – but it’s not transformative either.′Conservative MP Kieran Mullan criticises Labour's UK-EU reset deal saying the fishermen are losing outFiona Bruce points out that its the same terms the Conservative government negotiatedKieran Mullan then humiliates himself trying to disagree with the deal his own government… pic.twitter.com/GixsIAORmt— Farrukh (@implausibleblog) May 22, 2025Other guests also took issue with Mullan’s language.“What really, really frustrates me is if Kieran is going to sit here and say, ‘this isn’t a good deal,’ tell us what you think is a good deal,” fellow panellist and barrister Hashi Mohamed said. “That’s the rhetoric that I really don’t buy.”He also said: “Using extreme examples and the rhetoric that you’re using to try and inject that kind of extreme example into what should be a rational debate does not help anyone.”Similarly, journalist Inaya Floarin said, “even as someone that campaigned for Brexit... I am quite sceptical of the rhetoric of surrender.”An audience member also slammed the Tory legacy as a whole, saying: “There’s a pattern here, it’s the same with Brexit.“A lot of these issues were caused by the Conservative government. And now there’s a government that is trying to clean up the mess they made.“And they’re giving out about the way they’re trying to clean up this mess.”Related...The Tory Party Will Be Dead In 10 Years, A Labour Minister Has ClaimedBBC Question Time Audience Laughs As Fiona Bruce Skewers Tory Chairman Over His Party's Record'A Dead Party Walking': Starmer Savages The Tories In PMQs Clash With Badenoch

Comments

Similar News

Breaking news